The review of the Kokoda Trail for a World Heritage listing by the late Mr Peter Hitchcock, Dr Jennifer Gabriel and Dr Matthew Leavesley has exposed the myth of its relevance to our shared wartime heritage associated with the Kokoda campaign. The authors of the 2nd Joint Understanding should be called upon to explain why they were not aware of the review – or why they chose to ignore it.

  • There were no New Zealand forces involved in the Kokoda campaign;
  • the ‘Brown River catchment area as a possible power and water resource for Port Moresby was not identified; and
  • there is no mention of the significance of our shared military heritage across the Kokoda Trail.

First Joint Understanding: 23 April 2008

  • Sustainable development of people and communities along the Kokoda Track corridor, including improved economic opportunities and livelihoods, health, education, transport and related services.
    • Preservation of the historic values of the Kokoda Track, and maintenance of the integrity of the Track and of the special qualities of the trekking experience.
    • Preservation of the water catchment in the Owen Stanley Ranges for future power and water supply for Port Moresby.
    • Maximising the potential forest carbon benefits.
    • Recognition of the World Heritage cultural and biodiversity values of the Owen Stanley Ranges.’
  • An improved standard of living, quality of life, and access to basic services for communities along the Kokoda Track corridor.
  • Improved opportunities for income generation, through the following:
    • sharing benefits from tourism on the Kokoda Track, through better distribution of trekking fees and development of local income generation opportunities (business and employment);
    • improved access to markets (transport) for other income generation opportunities; and
    • assistance with quantifying and accessing long term benefits from natural resources (e.g. water and/ or carbon rights). In this regard, investment in avoided deforestation in the Owen Stanley Ranges may deliver wider benefits for communities and national natural resource management.
  • The preservation of social and cultural values of the World War II route.
  • A feasibility study into a World Heritage nomination and management framework.
  • The impacts of trekking are managed to deliver clear net environmental benefits for the Kokoda Track Communities.
  • The PNG Government is supported in its efforts to maintain the Brown River Catchment, given its national importance as a potential water and power supply for Port Moresby.
  • The Owen Stanley Ranges, as one of PNG’s major carbon stores, will be assessed along with other locations as potential sites for demonstration REDD activities within the Papua New Guinea – Australia Forest Carbon Partnership.
  • The World Heritage values of the Kokoda Track and Owen Stanley Ranges are understood and, where appropriate, protected.
  • Address immediate needs for the 2008 trekking season and create interim Kokoda Track management arrangements.
  • Develop appropriate and effective coordination and management arrangements for the long term.
  • Under the Papua New Guinea – Australia Forest Carbon Partnership, Australia is assisting PNG to develop a national forest carbon accounting system. This system will enable PNG to respond to reporting requirements of the UN Climate Change Convention and support REDD demonstration activities, and participation in future international emissions trading.  This system may also assist in monitoring requirements for the World Heritage listing of the Owen Stanley Ranges.
  • PNG aims to develop a 3-5-year REDD plan with its development partners by the end of 2008. Australian support will be provided within the context of the three areas of the Papua New Guinea – Australia Forest Carbon Partnership: policy dialogue, forest carbon accounting and REDD demonstration activities.

World Heritage

  • Deployment of Australian Government experts to the PNG Department of the Environment and Conservation to facilitate PNG Government processes to enable identification and consideration of a proposed World Heritage area.
  • Provision of expert advice to assist PNG in undertaking a values assessment and associated comparative analysis for a potential World Heritage nomination.
  • If appropriate, provision of expert advice to assist PNG with ongoing management of any identified World Heritage area (for example through a twinning arrangement with managers of an Australian World Heritage area).
Comment
Initiatives introduced to provide ‘improved opportunities for income generation’ have clearly failed.

No action has been taken to prepare a Military Heritage Master Heritage Plan for the Kokoda Trail or to protect historical sites which have been desecrated since the signing of the Joint Understanding. No action has been taken to develop a master plan to protect the environment of the Kokoda Trail. As a result, large sections of the trail have been degraded and sections of the trail are dangerously unsafe. No action has been taken to identify landowners along the trail or to identify the indigenous names of geographic features, rivers and creeks along the trail. The issues relating to Climate Change and World Heritage are irrelevant to our shared wartime heritage along the Kokoda Trail.

2nd Joint Understanding: 10 September 2015

‘6. We recognise that the communities living in the Kokoda Track region are custodians of a land that has spiritual connections for both Papua New Guineans and Australians. We acknowledge their development needs, including in service delivery and improved economic opportunities.

Comment:
The fact that ‘mateship’ was substituted by ‘friendship’ indicates that it was prepared by Department of Environment officials who are either ideologically opposed to the term ‘mateship’ or do not understand the military significance of the term.

The authors of the document were obviously unaware that the Chinese Government had committed to the construction of the Edevu Dam on the Brown River to secure the future water and hydro needs of Port Moresby.

The authors also seem to be unaware that the ‘culture’ of the Koiari and Orokaiva people along the trail has been subjugated by the Seventh Day Adventist Church who have eliminated all traditional customs from village life. All villagers now attend church twice daily at 6.00 AM and 6.00 PM and virtually all day on the Sabbath. Their devotion to the church is an impediment to providing opportunities for additional income as they are obligated to do enough work to maintain their food supply and the rest of their day is devoted to the church. The benefits from their Christian conversion are that there are no alcohol or drug issues across the trail; no alcohol-fuelled domestic violence issues; they are dedicated to better health and education outcomes; and to traditional clan and family structures.

References to a World Heritage listing are irrelevant to the Kokoda Trail as ‘wartime heritage’ is not a factor for consideration for such a listing.

Report on a Review of the Kokoda Trail for a World Heritage Listing[ii]


[ii] https://www.sprep.org/attachments/VirLib/PNG/world-heritage-sites-png.pdf